ACR Journal

December 2022 | January 2023 The focus on climate change has meant extraordinary growth in worldwide environmental legislation. Regulation has led to an increasing pressure on our industry to transition away from ozone depleting substances and potent greenhouse gases. Regulation has a big influence on our industry but, ultimately, the customer will drive the direction, and we all have a role to play. There is a requirement to educate customers on the added values and benefits of adopting sustainable practices, and to provide products and services to help lower the overall carbon footprint of businesses. REFRIGERANTS 22 A-Gas Group sustainability and regulatory director Ken Logan explains how Net Zero can be achieved by working with customers to increase the circularity of our industry through recovery and reclamation. The road to Net Zero Every country is at a different point on their journey to net-zero. As a global business, A-Gas is well positioned to look at the similarities across the continents and share best practice to benefit all. There are a lot of parallels between the USA and Europe/UK in this respect. Europe and the UK, through the F-Gas regulation and upcoming revisions, has great ambitions to lower greenhouse gas emissions, achieved by placing on-the- market controls on virgin refrigerants. Dealing with legacy products The USA’s drive towards incentivising circularity means they are catching up and, to some extent, overtaking Europe and the UK very quickly. Their balanced phasedown of HFC gases already includes the requirement for recovery, reclamation and re-use (circularity) of refrigerants. The R4 legislation in California is a prime example of this, where reclaimed refrigerant is installed – instead of virgin – in new air conditioning units. This focus puts the USA ahead of Europe and the UK in terms of laying the foundations for increasing the recovery and reclamation of refrigerants and effectively dealing with the huge installed bank of legacy products. In Europe and the UK there are no added incentives for businesses to embrace the circularity of refrigerants, which would lower potential emissions and have a far greater impact on our climate than switching to a lower GWP refrigerant alone. It is well known that it is at the equipment’s end of life that potential emissions of refrigerant to atmosphere are most prevalent. Yet, committing to recovery and reclamation is down to the contractor and end user, with governments failing to recognise the potential emission savings that can be made from such activity. This raises the question: what is going to happen to the installed bank of HFCs that are already in use in equipment across Europe and the UK if this is not worked into the overall emission reduction plan? The right way to face this challenge is to adopt the principles of the circular economy and, when these gases are no longer required, reclaim them for re-use and correctly destroy them in a safe and verifiable process, only if no further re-use option is available. The circular economy is the opposite to the take, make and dispose business model. It forces us to seek greater efficiencies and make better use of what we already have. It is imperative that Europe and the UK provides incentives to do the right thing to transition the installed bank over time to lower GWP refrigerants and properly manage the lifecycle of the legacy products to avoid harm to the environment. Europe, including the UK, is avoiding this discussion. In the latest F-Gas proposals, there is nothing relating to the existing installed bank of refrigerants. Legislators must come up with good solutions to meet this challenge. Across Europe, there is something in the region of half a million tonnes of refrigerant out there in use – and that is a very large figure. How do we tackle this? Firstly, we need to educate policy decision makers. Secondly, we need holistic solutions to solve the overall problem, and thirdly, there Volume 9 No.1